For more information about how Halldale can add value to your marketing and promotional campaigns or to discuss event exhibitor and sponsorship opportunities, contact our team to find out more
The Americas -
holly.foster@halldale.com
Rest of World -
jeremy@halldale.com
With the live I/ITSEC 2020 being cancelled and transforming to a virtual event, vIITSEC, MS&T’s Chuck Weirauch looks back at the virtual TSIS held in June and reviews its participation and content and provides a contract opportunities chart for MS&T readers.
Undaunted by the Covid-19 crisis, the success of the virtual 2020 Training and Simulation Industry Symposium (TSIS) held online in June provided a major demonstration as to how networked information-sharing can help provide the solutions to physical limitations. During the three-day event, leading procurement officials from the primary US Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine training organizations provided the latest in contract opportunity information from their headquarters’ locations with more than 700 TSIS industry representatives. As a nearly 15-year participant in the TSIS event, I can say that this year’s show at least equaled the past few years’ level of participation and the quality of the presentations.
The Air Force had more presence at this TSIS than ever before, with three Service presenters kicking off Day 1. Leading off was Paul Waugh, Program Executive Officer and Director for the Agile Combat Support Directorate at the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. His Directorate provides management for 271 acquisition, sustainment military sales, and rapid prototyping programs for the Service, he pointed out.
“We need to place an emphasis in building a brand for Agile Combat Support,” Waugh emphasized. “The key to accomplishing goal is the development of solid innovation across the Air Force.”
One area of concentration for such innovation is Agile Software Development, Waugh pointed out. With such tools, incorporating aircraft operations data into simulators can be done within six months, not the conventional two years, he said. To also provide the basis for such innovation, the Service also needs to have more government-owned open architectures so that rapid changes can be made to aircraft and simulator systems. Waugh also advocated the incorporation of animated digital logistics through digital engineering, and leveraging the latest gaming technologies, he summed up.
Colonel John Kurian, Senior Materiel Leader and Chief of the Simulators Division, Agile Combat Directorate, told the TSIS participants that his division has supported $3 billion in contract activity over 2018, 2019 and 2020. His goal was to gain more recognition for his organization, stating that he wants it to be known as the “front door” for simulation for the Air Force. He also echoed Waugh’s call for more innovation to make sure that the Service can provide a training environment that is concurrent with weapons systems, as is called for in the Air Force Operational Training Infrastructure 2035 Flight Plan document.
“We have to have the ability to become the Warfighter’s Digital Twin by simulating the entire Air Force going to war,” Kurian emphasized. “We really get at the gaming industry to replicate that environment and push this concept out here. We also need to push the boundaries on innovation in terms of cloud and common architectures.”
Captain Tim Hill, Commanding Officer of the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, (NAWCTSD) said that his Command has become the leading training acquisition agency for the Navy.
“Last year at TSIS there was a definite theme of growth for us, with a 20 percent increase in workforce and contractual obligations,” Hill pointed out. “This year we have stabilized at those levels, and continue to have strong demand. In fact, we reached a billion dollars in acquisition earlier than in any year in history. Telework and flexible schedules helped during the Covid impact, and our team has been nothing short of fantastic in these uncertain times.”
With the Navy’s recent reorganization complete, the Service is preparing for the “high-end fight” in live, virtual and constructive training, Hill said.
“We have seen record numbers for training systems utilization in the Fleet,” he added. “We are moving closer towards the Star Trek Holodeck vision, with improved data-driven decision-making.”
Focus areas for the Navy remain delivering expanded training capabilities to the Fleet, including LVC-based training solutions, Hill summed up. Other areas of concentration are: continuing to develop the Service’s Life-Long Learning efforts, implementing intelligent tutoring, and developing embedded training performance assessment.
James Geurts, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition, provided another perspective at the TSIS via a networked Zoom interview. He said that the employment of AR and VR technology for training is helping make “our operators more self-sufficient.”
“We need to really leverage AR and VR technology for training, and use these technologies to train the crew better as they prepare for their job, and make their jobs easier for them,” Guerts stated. “It's less about the technology, and more about creative employment of the technology. But it's not just good enough to discover there is a technology solution. We have to get it around to deployment. We really need to network this all together to share and operate at network speed. We're long past the time when we can ask every organization to come up with their own solution.”
The next major presenter at the TSIS was Major General Maria Gervais, Director of the US Army’s Synthetic Training Environment (STE) Cross Functional Team. Her presentation was made in cooperation with the Army’s Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation (PEO STRI). According to Gervais, the STE, a component of the Army’s Future Command, will be the Service’s next revolution in training. The backbone of the STE is the development and integration of a true Live, Virtual and Constructive training environment.
“The issue is whether we have a training evolution or a training revolution,” Gervais emphasized. “Over the past five decades we have made evolutionary, incremental changes in our training, which are the results of a specific need, such as a trainer to the specific platform that has been fielded to the Force. The challenge is that most were developed using 1980s’ technology before the Internet and cloud computing. We can’t effectively replicate the operational environment for the future this way.”
“The STE Information System is the Army’s revolutionary training platform, with virtual, live and next-generation constructive training,” she summed up. “It is leading the training revolution by accelerating requirements and the development process to rapidly deliver the training capabilities to the Warfighter.”
The RFP for $25 billion Air Force Training Systems Acquisition IV (TSA IV) omnibus contract, under which nearly all Service training and simulation contracts will be issued, was expected to be issued in November 2020, but that announcement may be delayed. The previous such contract, TSA III, was awarded to multiple companies in September 2015. No specific update information in regard to the TSA IV was announced at TSIS 2020, except that the contract Need date was cited as April 2022, with the RFP to be released sometime in the 2020/2021 timeframe. A December 2022 award date is possible.
The Navy’s primary contracting vehicle for training product maintenance and upgrade, the Fielded Training Systems Support (FTSS), is up for renewal. The $1billion FTSS V multiple award contract RFP is scheduled for release during the second quarter of FY 2021, with an award in the fourth quarter of FY 2021.
The RFP for the Army’s $957 million Cyber Training, Readiness, Integration, Delivery and Enterprise Technology (CYBER-TRIDENT) eight-year contracting vehicle, announced at last year’s TSIS, was pushed out until the third quarter of 2020, with a contract award date of 3Q FY 2021.
PEO STRI’s Gunnery Training Systems contract, announced last year at the TSIS, is now a completely new, seven-year, ID/IQ competitive procurement contract vehicle with an estimated contract value of $340 million. The new RFP is scheduled for release during the 4th quarter of 2020, with an award planned for 4Q/22.
Contracts listed in the order they were presented at TSIS 2020 (Sole source, International, awarded and Imminent Award Contracts not listed)
Contract Title | Value | RFP Date | Award Date | Contact |
Fielded Training Systems Support V | $1 billion | 2Q/FY21 | 4Q/FY21 | robin.wieickhorst@navy.mil |
E2-D Hawkeye Integrated Training System 1V | $390M | Jun/20 | 3Q/FY21 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
Aviation Courseware Development | $100M | Sep/20 | 2Q/FY21 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
P-8A Technology Refresh (Jacksonville NAS) | $100M | 3Q/FY22 | 1Q/FY23 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
P-8A Training Systems Increment 3 Aircrew Retrofits | $100M | May/20 | 3Q/FY21 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
P-8A Whidbey Island Tech Refresh | $100M | 3Q/FY23 | 3Q/FY 24 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
E-6B Training Systems Tech Refresh | $6M | 2/Q FY20 | 1Q/FY21 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
P-8A Training Systems Inc 3 Maintenance Rfits | $15M | 2Q/FY 21 | 3Q/FY22 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
H-60 Maintenance Trainer Tech Refresh | $6M | 1Q/FY21 | 1Q/FY22 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
MH-60 R RAN Operator/Maintenance Concurrency | TBD | 2Q/FY20 | 3Q/FY20 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
F/A-18 C/D Simulated Aircraft Maint. Train. | $12M | 3Q/FY21 | 1Q/FY23 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
F/A-18 E/F/G Maintenance Training Tech Ref. | $12M | 3Q/FY21 | 1Q/FY23 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
F/A-18 E/F/G Technology Refresh | $25M | 1Q/FY22 | 1Q/FY23 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
KC 130J Fuselage Trainer & Observer Train Aid | $19.5M | Nov/21 | May/22 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
KC 130J Weapons System Trainer and Cockpit Procedures Trainer Procurement | $33.5M | Feb/22 | August/22 | brian.hicks@navy.mil |
CNATRA T-45C Pensacola OFT Tech Refresh | TBD | 4Q/FY22 | 2Q/FY 23 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
CNATRA T-45C VTMS Aircraft &Sim Align. | $45M | Jun/2020 | 2Q/FY21 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
CNATRA Multi-Crew Simulator Block 2 Mod | $7.5M | 4Q/FY21 | 2Q/FY22 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
F-16 Technology Refresh | $7M | 4Q/FY22 | 2Q/FY23 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
MQ-8 Technology Refresh | $25M | 4Q/FY23 | 2Q/FY24 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
F-5N Technology Refresh | $7M | 4Q/FY 24 | 2Q/FY25 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
Parachute In-Water Release Trainer Upgrade | $4M | 4Q/FY20 | 1Q/FY21 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
Tower Simulation System Block Upgrade | $5M | 1Q/FY20 | 2Q/FY20 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
Helicopter Recue Hoist Trainer | $4.4M | 1Q/FY20 | 2Q/FY20 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
Air Traffic Navigation, Integration, Coordination | $5M | 1Q/FY21 | 2Q/FY21 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
Precision Approach Radar Upgrade | $5M | 1Q/FY22 | 2Q/FY22 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
Landing Signal Officer Trainer Upgrade | TBD | TBD//FY22 | TBD/FY22 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
USMC Aviation Distributed Virtual Training Environment (ADVTE) Tech Upgrade | $40M | Jul/2020 | 2Q/FY21 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
AV-8B Maintenance Trainer Refresh | $2.5M | June 2020 | Mar 2021 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
AV-8B Deployable Mission Rehearsal Trainer | $6M | June 2021 | Mar 2021 | lisa.m.sullivan1@navy.mil |
Fielded Training Systems Support (FTSS) V | $1.75B | 2Q/FY21 | 2Q/FY22 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
Pilot and Aircrew Courseware E-2/C-2 LSO | $5M | July/20 | 3Q/FY21 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
Pilot and Aircrew Courseware USV/USMC | $12M | 1Q/22 | 2Q/FY22 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
Pilot and Aircrew Courseware Maritime | $10M | 1Q/22 | 2Q/FY22 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
USMC Aviation Training Systems COM/CIS | $125M | 3Q/FY20 | 1Q/FY21 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
Contractor Instructional Services, Atlantic | $90M | 1Q/FY21 | 3Q/FY21 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
F/A-18 COMS/CIS | $107M | July/20 | 2Q/FY21 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
CNATRA COMS | $20M | 3Q/FY21 | 1Q/FY22 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
CNATRA CIS | $140M | 3Q/FY22 | 2Q/FY23 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
Maritime COMS | $80M | 1Q/FY22 | 3Q/FY22 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
Naval Aviation Technical Training Center | $16M | 3Q/22 | 1Q/FY23 | robin.wieckhorst@navy.mil |
LCS Mission Bay Trainer Tech Refresh | $10M | 2Q/FY20 | 1Q/FY21 | paul.honold@navy.mil |
Advanced Computer-based Training Systems Multi-award | $200M | 1Q/FY21 | 1Q/FY22 | paul.honold@navy.mil |
|
|
|
|
|
Target and Threats Hardware for Readiness Evaluation and Testing System (New) | $954M | May/20 | May/22 | PM-ITTS |
Cyber Training, Readiness, Integration, Delivery And Enterprise Technology (CYBER TRIDENT) | $957M | 3Q/FY20 | 3Q/FY21 | PM-ITTS |
Intelligence & Electronic Warfare Tactical Proficiency Trainer II | $200M | Oct/20 | 1Q/22 | PM-ITTS |
Aerial Targets Flight Services 3 | $107M | 2Q/20 | 2Q/21 | PM-ITTS |
Army Ground Aerial Target Control System | $49.5M | 4Q/FY20 | 3Q/FY21 | PM-ITTS |
Target Management Office Ops & Services | $410M | 1Q/FY21 | 1Q/FY22 | PM-ITTS |
Combat Training Center Tower Efforts | $21M | 3Q/FY20 | 4QFY20 | PM Soldier Training |
Gunnery Training Systems (GTS) | $340M | 4Q/FY20 | 4Q/FY21 | PM Soldier Training |
Maritime Integrated Training System | TBD | Q/FY20 | 4Q/FY20 | PM TRADE |
System Enhancement Package (SeP2) | TBD | 3Q/FY20 | 4Q/FY20 | PM TRADE |