Collective Defense Training

U.S. Army Atlantic Resolve Soldiers and two NATO battle groups teamed up to conduct command post exercise Rifle Focus II. The wargame tested NATO allies and higher echelon’s battle decisions and strategies in a simulated training environment.

Instead of deploying real units, soldiers, and assets, which can be time-consuming and expensive, simulation software is used instead to virtually display different units, squads, assets and support. The exercise operationally aligned all assets and opposing forces like a chess board. The different pieces of this board were higher command, exercise command, lower control, and a tactical operations center. The training featured a wide variety of players, including the U.S. Army Washington National Guard, 1st Infantry Division’s 3rd Battalion, 66th Armored Regiment, British Army, German Army, Netherlands Army, Norwegian Army, Croatian Army, Polish Territorial Defense Force and Romanian Army.

“This is the first time Bemowo Piskie Training Area has hosted a CPX,” said U.S. Army National Guard Lt. Col. Craig Broyles, the Battle Group Poland commander. “This is going to make us a much better NATO force, but also build the seeds for further training opportunities and experiences.”

The training would not have been possible without the support of 7th Army Training Command’s Joint Multinational Simulation Center, based out of Grafenwoehr, Germany. The JMSC was the exercise control for the CPX, using software simulations to control scenarios and train the NATO soldiers. Without them, there would not be constructive simulations for the battalions to conduct their exercises.

The exercise began each day from exercise control, as they introduced different scenarios to the battle groups each day. The battle groups’ mission essential tasks included conducting attacks, moving to contact, area defense and security and deployment operations.

At this point, higher control, led by Washington Army National Guard G-3, provided injects, actions that required a response from the battalion staff. Lower control received the injects and communicated them to the tactical operations center. From there, the various multinational battalion staff coordinated and strategized together and conducted the missions in the simulation.

Both battle groups were tested on the exact same scenarios, but each navigated them with their own unique strategies, capabilities and decisions. At the end of every day, each battle group conducted an after action review, comparing each other’s decision-making.

It was a unique opportunity for an infantry regiment and an armored regiment to see how each other conducted their movements, reacted to contact and navigated the terrain. Because of the vast amount of experience and perspectives channeled through the exercise, the CPX was a huge success in engaging the partnership and interoperability across NATO.